Between 2022 and 2023, nearly 600 survivors sued Los Angeles County over sexual abuse at its juvenile facilities — Barry J. Nidorf (Sylmar) Juvenile Hall, Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall, Central Juvenile Hall, and Camp Kilpatrick among them — describing staff who abused the youth in their custody, traded contraband for sexual favors, and retaliated against anyone who reported it. In February 2025, more than two dozen survivors sued San Diego County over abuse at Camp Barrett, Rancho del Campo, and the Girls Rehabilitation Facility spanning 1970 to 2022, some of it on a near-daily basis. The pattern repeats across the state: abuse in cells, showers, and bathrooms and during strip searches, by probation officers, correctional officers, counselors, and teachers who used threats of physical harm, extended confinement, or retaliation to keep children silent. Criminal charges have followed against staff in Riverside, Ventura, San Bernardino, Alameda, Imperial, San Mateo, Kern, Santa Clara, Fresno, Monterey, San Joaquin, and Merced counties. One survivor was 10 years old.
The same failures run through California's residential treatment centers, behavioral health facilities, group homes, and foster placements: operators and placing agencies that hired without adequate screening, gave adults unsupervised access to children who could not leave, ignored or buried reports, moved known abusers rather than removing them, and left children with no safe way to tell anyone. In foster care, liability often turns on notice — a county or agency that had already received a report about the home or the abuser, or that placed a child with someone previously charged with child sexual abuse, and left the child there anyway. These claims do not depend on the abuser ever having been arrested, charged, or convicted.
If you were sexually abused as a minor in a California juvenile hall, camp, treatment center, group home, or foster placement, you may be able to hold the county, agency, or operator that was responsible for your safety accountable.

Every detail you share through this case review — your story, the facility or placement where the abuse occurred, any reports or grievances you made, records or treatment history you have, and how the abuse affected you — stays between you and our intake team. We do not sell, rent, or share your information with third parties, and your participation is never made public. Many survivors in the pending California cases have filed under “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” pseudonyms to protect their identities.
Damages vary by case, and every survivor's situation is different. Common categories of damages in childhood sexual abuse cases against juvenile facilities, treatment centers, group homes, and foster agencies include:
Therapy, trauma-focused counseling, psychiatric care, inpatient stays, medication, and follow-up treatment for PTSD, depression, anxiety, substance-use disorders, and related conditions tied to sexual abuse suffered as a child in a juvenile facility, treatment center, group home, or foster placement.
Long-term therapy, ongoing psychiatric treatment, residential or intensive outpatient programs, and the cost of recovery that often continues for years — and sometimes decades — into adulthood.
Treatment for injuries caused by assault, reproductive and gynecological care, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, and any care made necessary by the abuse or by the medical attention that was withheld after it.
Wages lost to time off work, interrupted schooling and job training, and the lasting reduction in earning capacity that can follow childhood trauma — on top of the disadvantages a placement history already creates.
Emotional distress, humiliation, loss of trust, and the diminished quality of life caused by sexual abuse in a place you could not leave, could not report from safely, and could not protect yourself inside.
Harm caused by what followed a report or a refusal: extended confinement, isolation or room restriction, lost privileges and visitation, disrupted placements and transfers, and the effect those consequences had on a child's case, programming, and release.
The schooling, stability, relationships, and ordinary development that abuse in placement took from a child — and the long shadow it casts over adult life.
California law allows increased damages when a survivor proves the abuse resulted from an institution's effort to conceal known abuse — for example, by hiding or ignoring reports, or by moving an abuser rather than removing them.
In cases like these, the county or probation department that ran a juvenile facility, the private operator of a treatment center or group home, and the county or foster family agency that made and monitored a placement may be held accountable for negligent hiring, supervision, and retention of the adults they put in charge of children; for failing to protect children who could not leave; for ignoring, discouraging, or burying reports; for moving known abusers rather than removing them; and for retaliating against children who spoke up. California generally allows survivors of childhood sexual abuse to file until age 40 — and in some cases later — so it is worth checking even if the abuse happened decades ago. The only reliable way to know whether your claim is still open is to have it reviewed.
See if You QualifyAt Gould Grieco & Hensley, we represent survivors who were sexually abused as children in California's juvenile halls and probation camps, residential treatment centers, group homes, and foster placements. Our attorneys work closely with each client, with the discretion and care these cases demand, to pursue accountability from the counties, agencies, and operators that were responsible for keeping them safe and failed.
Our attorneys handle complex civil cases involving the sexual abuse of children in institutional settings — juvenile detention, residential treatment, group homes, and foster systems, where adults held total authority over the children in their care. The team reviewing your case has worked in this category before.
We come ready to take cases through to trial when defendants resist a fair resolution. The credible threat of trial is what drives settlements — and it's a posture not every firm can credibly hold.
You pay nothing up front and nothing during the case. Fees only apply if we recover compensation on your behalf.
This is an advertisement of the law firm Gould Grieco & Hensley, to bring claims against Juvenile Halls in the state of Illinois. This webpage’s content is provided for informational purposes only by Gould Grieco & Hensley, located at 101 N Wacker Drive Suite 100, Chicago IL. Visit us at gghlaw.com. This site contains general information that may not be up to date, assumes findings of fact, and is for illustrative purposes only. A more detailed analysis of your particular case would be required to obtain a better estimate of what you are owed. There is no guarantee that a Court or Arbitrator would rule in your favor. This does not create a client-attorney relationship. It is not intended to provide legal advice. For legal advice, you will need to consult an attorney at Gould Grieco & Hensley. Past results are not indicative of future results and do not guarantee any particular outcome.